Stage 1 of 8 · Set up and assess
Set up governance
Decide how AI is governed and who decides.
For reference purposes only. Not legal advice.
What this stage is for
Without clear decision rights, nobody is answerable when an AI system produces a bad outcome. This stage creates the authority, rules and people that every later stage relies on. Think of it in two layers: a governance charter (the 'what and why': purpose, scope, authority, meeting cadence, escalation) and an operating model (the 'how': workflows, roles and tooling).
Who is involved
Executive sponsor, AI governance lead, Legal, Privacy, Security, HR.
Key outputs: AI policy, governance charter, RACI, training plan.
Step-by-step tasks
Tick each task as you complete it. Your ticks stay in this browser tab unless you export your workspace.
Region callouts
Shown for the regions in My regions (header). The region pages are never hidden.
The EU AI Act expects staff to have AI literacy and expects providers of high-risk systems to run a quality management system. The AI literacy wording was touched by the Digital Omnibus, so check the current text. European Union page
No federal AI statute sets a governance program, but the NIST AI RMF 'Govern' function is the common backbone, and customers and regulators often ask about alignment. United States page
The UK's five principles include accountability and governance. Regulators expect named responsibility for AI use in your sector. United Kingdom page
The India AI Governance Guidelines are voluntary but a useful base for your policy's principles. India page
Tools and templates
Tools
- Start here planner: Six answers become a 30/60/90-day plan.
- Policy builder: Assemble a policy from reviewed clauses.
- RACI builder: Agree who does what.
- Learning paths and training tracker: Paths, quizzes and a training plan table.
- NIST AI RMF explorer and self-assessment: Explore and score against the four functions.
- ISO/IEC 42001 gap analysis and SoA builder: Clauses 4 to 10 and Annex A by reference number.
Templates
- "AI at work" quick reference card: MD, DOCX, DOCX, EU edition, DOCX, US edition, DOCX, UK edition, DOCX, India edition
- AI change management and rollout plan: MD, DOCX
- AI ethics review board charter: MD, DOCX
- AI governance charter: MD, DOCX
- AI meeting assistant and note-taker policy: MD, DOCX
- AI tools onboarding guide for new staff: MD, DOCX
- AI use policy: MD, DOCX
- Data classification guide for AI tool use: MD, DOCX
- Employee acceptable use policy for AI tools: MD, DOCX, DOCX, EU edition, DOCX, US edition, DOCX, UK edition, DOCX, India edition
- ISO/IEC 42001 gap analysis (clauses 4 to 10, references only): XLSX, CSV, DOCX
- ISO/IEC 42001 statement of applicability (Annex A by reference number): XLSX, CSV, DOCX
- NIST AI RMF gap analysis (functions and categories): XLSX, CSV, DOCX
- RACI matrix: XLSX, CSV, DOCX
- Staff AI awareness training deck with speaker notes: MD, DOCX
- Training plan and attendance record: XLSX, CSV, DOCX
- All templates for every stage
Common mistakes
- Writing a long policy no one reads, instead of a short one people follow.
- Naming a committee but no single accountable person.
- Treating the policy as a one-off document with no review date.
You're done when…
- A policy is approved and shared with staff.
- One accountable lead is named.
- A governance group meets on a set schedule.
- Roles are written down in a RACI.
Reviewed 3 Oct 2026.
Was this page useful? Tell us what is missing or wrong ↗ · Report a correction