Stage 3 of 8 · Set up and assess
Assess risk and impact
Understand how risky each system is and for whom.
For reference purposes only. Not legal advice.
What this stage is for
Match the effort to the risk. Screen each system against written criteria, work out which rules apply in each region, and for higher-risk uses assess the impact on the people affected. A short, consistent assessment beats a long one done once.
Who is involved
Product owner, AI governance lead, Legal, Privacy, Risk and compliance.
Key outputs: Screening result, applicability record, impact assessment.
Step-by-step tasks
Tick each task as you complete it. Your ticks stay in this browser tab unless you export your workspace.
Region callouts
Shown for the regions in My regions (header). The region pages are never hidden.
Screen against the EU AI Act's four tiers. Some deployers of high-risk systems, such as public bodies, must assess impact on fundamental rights before use. European Union page
Some state laws require risk or impact assessments for automated decisions about people (for example California and Colorado, from 2027). These dates are not settled. United States page
Run data protection impact assessments where personal data is used in AI, and check outcomes against the Equality Act. United Kingdom page
Plan for DPDP duties as they phase in, and for extra duties if you are designated a Significant Data Fiduciary. India page
Tools and templates
Tools
- EU risk screening: Screen one system against the EU AI Act risk tiers.
- Applicability checker: Which laws and frameworks apply to one system, and why.
- Impact assessment builder: A structured assessment with region annexes.
- AI risk register: Organization-wide AI risks with a risk library.
- Law explorer (EU AI Act key articles): The EU AI Act article by article.
Templates
- AI data protection impact assessment (EU and UK GDPR oriented): MD, DOCX
- AI impact assessment: MD, DOCX
- AI risk register with starter risk library (5 x 5 scoring): XLSX, CSV, DOCX
- Risk assessment form: MD, DOCX
- All templates for every stage
Common mistakes
- Answering 'No' to keep the result low when unsure.
- Assessing the model but not the people it affects.
- Never re-running the assessment when the purpose changes.
You're done when…
- Every system has a tier and a recorded reason.
- Higher-risk systems have an impact assessment.
- Residual risk is accepted by a named person.
Reviewed 3 Oct 2026.
← Stage 2: Inventory and intake · Stage 4: Design controls and document →
Was this page useful? Tell us what is missing or wrong ↗ · Report a correction